@atheistpreacher: thank YOU for reading this lengthy piece.
@csl316: Wonderful comment, thank you! I do disagree that Double Fine can still use the scrappy underdog card after decades of being held on a pedestal. Like Molyneux, I think that rope is just at the end of its length. If they were, then their history should've taught them to reel in some of that ambition, instead of riding the wave. I think the doc(s) mentions having your cake a few times. I'm sure that, for now, Microsoft is willing to inject their resources into them, I just don't think they're doing that out of creative altruism, ya know? But I enjoyed disagreeing with this perspective, totally valid!
@nodima: Just listened to it from your comment. That was very interesting, thank you! I had listened to the first part, when they were only a couple of episodes in, so I enjoyed hearing how that evolved as well.
@borgmaster: Warren Spector pushed back on the tendency of people to attribute games to singular celebrity devs. Schafer is in that shortlist of celebs. That's who Microsoft is buying. I don't think Microsoft would bother to operate a house without that name, especially as the brand they're trying to grow isn't Double Fine, it's Xbox.
Log in to comment