Call of Duty W.A.W. is an excellent first-person shooter and many peolple agree with that, but some think Modern Warfare was a better addition to the Call of Duty series. I have to disagree. I believe that Call of Duty has a much better bullet to damage ratio and the campaign. Although i am angred that they took out the hardcore headquaters, W.A.W. has a great online experience because you have new additions such as dogs and new perks, but you still get that old Call of Duty feeling not like Modern Warfare where they overdosed the game on superpowered weapons and yes i know its modern weapons but does every weapon realy need a biult in stopping power? The blood and gore is a tiny bit more prevasive in World at War and that appeals to most shooter fans. Overall World at War wins in an all out better general gameplay.
