MERCH!
Giant Bomb - a website about video games and the people that make them

six years later and the third, more or less, holds up

Published October 4, 2017
4 out of 5 starsScore: 80/100

absurdity is, for all intents and purposes, the name of the game here. going into playing saints row: the third 6, almost 7 years after its release i had a decent idea of what to expect. some genuinely funny one-liners sprinkled in and around the action. explosions and lots of them. also, dildos. when everything was said and done, that's what i got. at the end of my 15 or so hours, i was highly satisfied recording sixties sci fi action movie sequences, invading cyberspace as a laser shooting toilet/sex doll and kidnapping b-grade tv stars as a sexy pope, just to name a few of the 'activities.' this isn't a game without caveats, however. being a moderately old video game, there are some aspects to it that don't totally hold up. there are parts of the writing/humor that straight up miss the mark (which is to be expected with how sophomoric the game is on the whole) and the open world movement/combat was too floaty for my likes, although it doesn't detract from the experience as a whole. to wrap it up, if you're looking to return to a video game buried deep in your pile of shame, you could do MUCH MUCH worse than saints row: the third. ultimately, despite showing some minor signs of age, the third is the same experience had by most in 2011.

The views here are this user’s only and are not representative of Giant Bomb's thoughts and opinions on the discussed video game. GB's official reviews reside at giantbomb.com/reviews.