@SethPhotopoulos said

Because games like DA:O and Witcher 2 are amazing.

Haha..

@Yadilie said:

@SethPhotopoulos said

Because games like DA:O and Witcher 2 are amazing.

Haha..

Alright, I see I'm talking to a crazy person.

As far as I'm aware, the game was basically released unfinished, being overtime and over budget. I guess SEGA must have just wanted to get the damn thing out there to try and make something from it. Although, even if it was finished, it still would have been bad, judging by everything else in that game.

The music is still rad, though.

@Video_Game_King said:

I see your Sonic 2006 and raise you Alone in the Dark 2008:

I liked this game. Buggy as hell, but fun and interesting.

I rented this when it first came out and yes, it is one of the worst games, if not the worst, that I can remember playing.

@SethPhotopoulos:

They're okay games but nothing amazing. Especailly when it comes down the gameplay of both of the games. Also low fantasy is quite boring.

@Yadilie said:

@SethPhotopoulos:

They're okay games but nothing amazing. Especailly when it comes down the gameplay of both of the games. Also low fantasy is quite boring.

I actually really like their gameplay as well as their stories. I usually don't like fantasy but The Witcher's and DA:O's worlds were well realized.

Daniel Negreanu IS the best poker player!

That game was such garbage.

This game is bad, but it's no Shadow the Hedgehog.

Is that a Darksiders spin off?

When I played it at the store as a kid it was really cool until you had to stop doing sonic stuff. The game got slow and boring and I only played it for like 15 minutes.

I'll say this; it's definitively worse than Duke Nukem Forever. Sure, DNF is horribly misogynistic and makes me ashamed for the folks at Gearbox and 3D Realms, but jesus, trying to play Sonic '06 drained the life force from me.