Two things come to mind has I read this stuff.
Aligning yourself with a political campaign, regardless which, means you are at least ok with the total package that they present. Mr Luckey has aligned himself with the Trump campaign which has shown itself to be, among other things, demonstrably racist and sexist. Has he aligned himself with this campaign because he supports these particular attributes? Only he can truly know. But at the very least he has indicated that he does not see these attributes as deal breakers. Even if he isn't actively espousing racist or sexist views, it could certainly be argued that by tolerating them in his candidate, he is at least "coloured" by such beliefs. Is that reason enough to vilify him? I suppose that's up to the individual to decide but I certainly think it is. These are abhorrent, deplorable views that disqualify someone from getting a pass. Even if you are supporting Trump exclusively for his economic "policy" for example you do not get a pass. I have family and many friends who I am not willing to throw under the bus(or watch get run over) because it means more money in my pocket. Perhaps there is a distinction to be made between being actively racist, sexist, etc and being passively racist, sexist, etc. Whether or not that is a meaningful distinction is open to debate. Personally, I'm not sure it is.
I'm continually shocked by how often people, especially young people(I am in this group), make light of this election through "memefication" and trolling. Do people truly not understand the stakes in this election? I love a bit of political comedy but this stuff is just... vomit inducing. Mr Luckey says in the Daily Beast article that he sees this as a "...jolly good time." Really? I've seen and had discussions with many people who are legitimately rooting for Trump simply because they find him entertaining. Are you for real?? Many, many people stand to have their rights curtailed. Many people's lives are legitimately riding on the results of this election(internationally as well as domestically). In light of these stakes, I don't know how people can engage in these activities with a clear conscience. You're dumbing down and obfuscating election issues when it is so crucially important, especially in this election, that people go to the polls well informed. I'm not sure I can look at someone who engaged in or supported political trolling in this election and think of them as a good person. Politics should never be entertainment first as these decisions have very real implications for all our futures.
Is this enough to boycott the Rift if Mr Luckey is indeed still associated with the product? I can't afford vr at the moment anyway, but in the future I will not be buying an Oculus Rift.
And just a final note: I'd like to spare a thought for any future archaeologists and historians who might endeavour to comb through the heaping trash fire that is our contemporary political discourse in order to try and make sense of our times.
Log in to comment