I meant specifically in the case of Wu, sorry if that seemed broader than it should have been.
You're right that those people have been (and will continue to be) critical of the site. I invite that, as we can always do better. I don't have a problem with that. I wish everyone loved the site or saw things from our perspective, but you know what? That's not how it works, and people are going to disagree with your approach, people are going to offer differing perspectives, and it's important to listen to them. You might learn something. Disagreement will probably still be there, but that doesn't mean there isn't something to be offered in deep criticism.
I agree with listening to your critics, especially when twitter seems like such an echo chamber. My question to you would be, what does "we can always do better" mean? Is "better" capitulation to your critics, or your own goals? Are they the same? I'm not sure I'd be happy with a situation where you agree with those critics mentioned such as Allen, that GB is terrible, that the people who visit GB are terrible. Writing this did more harm in their eyes and you didn't appease them at all.
I don't think it's any more complicated than the idea that humans are always capable of improvement, and part of that improvement comes from listening to other people and having a dialogue.
But if its your site, make it what you want it to be. It doesn't have to be for everyone. The world does not have to be this completely sanitized thing.
I am not a big fan of the social issue stuff, so I don't read your stuff Patrick. That doesn't mean you should stop writing it, or make it more in line with my beliefs, or that i hate you; it doesn't mean shit. It just means I don't like it.
I think that people get riled up when people see others who don't agree with them and go out of their way to try and change their minds, at all costs. Some people do not want their minds changed and have their beliefs for good reason. Seeing someone say your thoughts or perspective is invalid is an absolute slap in the face, so what response do people expect when there is labeling as "Social Justice Warrior" or "Misogynist" going on. Marginalizing a person is an easy way to get them to shut their ears off and tell you to fuck off so you can say "See, they are animals who don't listen to reason."
If you really want to change someones mind, go out and march about something, or lobby your congressman for change. Real change comes from getting dirty. The threat of being slapped in the face or fucking hosed down isn't present on twitter, so its real easy to act high and mighty or righteous about ANY fucking issue. People need to stop thinking that posting snarky shit on twitter leads to anything. All it does is have people who agree with you go "yep" and people who don't go "nah b."
Twitter can be the spark, like it was with the arab spring, but that shit didn't just happen on the internet. People got run over by APCs, and blood was spilled. Real change takes risk. Sitting behind a keyboard ain't risky or edgy or progressive. It is the bare minimum, so people on all sides need to stop acting like they are in the trenches and stop being so hyperbolic and dramatic.
Say your piece and move on, but don't expect to have everyone like you or change anyone's mind in 140 characters.
Log in to comment