Here here. Nice to see someone gets it. The whole idea that R* is paying for reviews is just absurd. Sure it might happen with some companies (Kane & Lynch), but I seriously doubt R* would bother wasting the money. Why? Because despite how some of you might feel about GTA IV, the majority of purchasers loved the game and thought it was great. It sold fantastically and was highly regarded as one of the best games of the year. R* didn't need to pay anyone for that, it happened fully on the game's own merits. In fact, I can't think of a single R* game since at least GTA 3 that R* would have bothered to waste money on as far as paying for reviews. The games have all done phenomenally well and been highly regarded by all kinds of publications and people as fantastic. Why would they be paying for something they're getting anyway? That's just throwing money away, and last I checked, businesses aren't too keen on that.Those print reviews are not reflective towards each publication's overall view because it's all of the reviewers' own opinion and they might have been astonished by it, not for money; notice the bold on print. In order for magazines to get the reviews on time for release, Rockstar has to send them early copies. They have stricter deadlines due to the actual print and distribution process of making a magazine. Print is not the fucking internet.
Log in to comment