@Hunter5024: If you are celebrating the what, yes, actions are what matters. When you are talking about the "goodness" of a person, then motivation absolutely matters. Politicians give money to charity to drive votes all the time, and that's great for charity, and awesome, but it does by NO MEANS make them good people. Again, you're doing what every other quick to anger idiot on here has done: mix up what my indifference is leveled at. I think charity getting money is AWESOME. But I do not believe giving to charity when you live well above your means, and especially without doing more work than many who struggle to make it by on the paychecks they earn, makes you awesome. Notch made a silly game, and made a shit ton of money. Yes, he worked hard with his team. Yes, he made a really great thing. Yes, I'm glad it exists. But my father worked 6 day weeks, 12 hour days in construction and ended up with a lot of medical issues and thus medical bills, AND was barely able to support his family as a single parent. He did that for about 15 years, and yet in that time made less money than Notch did doing something he loves, and spent pretty much every last cent just getting by. So I could care less if you or anyone else thinks I'm an idiot or an ass for saying, "people who make a quick buck doing what they love or in a cushy job can live to donate a lot of their money without receiving any praise what so ever."
@Nottle said:
@MordeaniisChaos: I don't know. these comments seem very cynical, to paraphrase: "I'd pay that much if I had more money than god" "I'd pay if I was a multi millionaire" "A millionaire donates 6k, WOW impressive/ sarcasm." People are accusing Notch of vanity and that donating "only 6000" is so insincere. That seems like complaining. It is his money, he earned it, he can do what he wants with it.
I don't want to be that cynical, but if you want to be follow kantian ethics go ahead.
Also if you want to say that Notch has some sort of obligation or motive keep in mind the entire point of having games in exchange for donations is to motivate people to donate. Some people will donate money for the sake of good will, but I'm sure many people would not have donated if not for the games.
There's nothing cynical about considering it unworthy of praise. No one said he was an ass for only donating that much, just that it's not a huge amount. There was a time when Minecraft was making six times what my family got by on on a year, in one day so excuse me if I don't bow down to the rich man giving as much money as I've seen people with much less give. Like it or not, giving a fraction of your wealth away is nothing. Some of the richest people in the world spent most of their money and effort bettering mankind. Some of the poorest have dedicated their lives to bettering the lives of others. I know a guy who is giving up a potentially brilliant career and a huge scholarship to serve his country and live on pretty piss poor wages. They don't do it so they can get fucking recognized, so why the fuck does anyone care that some people feel charity should be anonymous and that a man who makes inordinate amounts of money donating a few thousand ever few months is no more worth praise then someone spending an hour at a soup kitchen. It's charity, if he wants praise, he can go when the Olympics or enlist and prove some valor, otherwise, he's still a guy in a hat that made an awesome thing and theoretically (assuming the money didn't just go to the devs, who have already had a hell o fa lot of success so I wouldn't consider that much "charity") does his part to keep the world a better place.
What I don't get is why everyone gives a fuck about how I don't idolize him for making a donation but I also don't demonize him for donating as much as he did, but he's allowed to do what he wants with all the money he made? How is his money any more his than my personal feelings towards him are mine to do with whatever we want? It's hilarious that I'm an ass for saying "Yay charity" and stopping there but he's a fucking angel for giving some tiny percent of the worth of a little thing called Minecraft. Seriously. As of a year ago, Minecraft had made $33 million. According to the stats page, over 6 million purchases were made. Considering the MINIMUM cost of the game, that's a shit ton of money. For a pretty tiny dev team, independently published. And if I had to guess, upkeep on Minecraft's servers isn't cheap, but it's far from monumental either. Yes, donating to charity is the right thing to do. But you know what? If you can criticize me for not fawning over Notch for his not so impressive donation to maybe a charity, maybe some of the most successful indie developers out there, then I can feel that way. It only makes sense, really. If I asked you to give 3% of your yearly earnings, you'd probably be A-Ok with that. How is it any more special when Notch does it, just because he has more money and therefore can afford to donate more? Hell, if it'll get me put on a pedestal, I'll give all of the $6.36 I have under my name to the first charity that asks.
All I have to say is this: people with money should be encouraged to help those who cannot help themselves. Like it or not, some people just have so much money that expecting them to put some of that "hard earned" cash back into the public well being isn't a big deal. You're all willing to do it, why shouldn't they be? Are you going to go around, asking for people to high five you because you donating some percent of your great wealth to a charity? Not without looking like an asshole. But then I'm an asshole for not wanting to go out and give you that high five even though you didn't ask for it in the first place. Logic. Brilliant, I see all of your points now.
In closing: Notch is probably a decent guy, wears a dumb hat, and means jack shit to me until he donates a large sum of money to the Wounded Warrior Program. Then, I'll give him a high five and no more.
Peace, I'm out.
Log in to comment