@inevpatoria: To be fair, several Souls like games come out every year since 2015, while I struggle to find any game like Mass Effect 2 since Mass Effect 3. By "game like Mass Effect 2", I mean a cinematic visual novel with a science fiction setting and servicable cover based shooting.
So the question here is, "Why?"
I don't have a good answer. I think it's an interesting question, though. Part of it, just speaking to the industry as a whole, might be the result of rigid cover-based shooting falling out of vogue. That's not a Mass Effect problem, really, but it affected the series in a fundamental way. You can see the impact of that made manifest in Andromeda's faster, jetpack-ier combat.
There's some degree, too, to which Mass Effects 2 and 3 (as well as peers of its time, like Telltale's The Walking Dead) showed the limitations and subsequent pitfalls of a player-agency narrative. Mass Effect 2 works so well because the branching paths didn't lead to conclusion, but to the feeling of greater potential. When it was up to Mass Effect 3 to tie the bow, it collapsed under the responsibility. Mass Effect 3 and The Walking Dead ended disappointingly because the illusion of choice was laid too bare.
In the case of Mass Effect, its developers tried to mitigate that by ending with a big, bold, world-altering conclusion. But that only served to frustrate players more, because not only were their choices inconsequential—the worlds they spent their time inhabiting were left in unfulfilling disrepair.
My opinion is that the Mass Effect 3 blowback retroactively stunted our collective regard for Mass Effect 2. It's kind of like The Matrix. You sort of can't talk about it without eventually bringing up its frustrating sequels. And it also affected how developers went on to make (or, in this instance, not make) other games of this type.
Now, don't get me wrong. Other games have done the player-agency thing extremely well. Even recently, it seems! But, as you say, none have the same swashbuckling disposition that Mass Effect did.
There's a whole separate one-to-two-thousand words I could write about why Dark Souls flourished in this time. A lot of it you can intone from what others have written in this thread already. But I think the fact that there were "more" Souls-like games than Mass Effect-like games only proves From Software's influence. But it isn't the reason why Dark Souls is more influential.
You can check those old threads. I was on the Mass Effect side of the debate at the end of the last generation. But it's pretty obvious now what game really stood the test of time.
Log in to comment