Tony Hawk: RIDE
Game » consists of 3 releases. Released Nov 17, 2009
The tenth game in the Tony Hawk series, RIDE featured the use of a newly conceived skateboard peripheral in an attempt, by Activision, to reboot the series.
Hawk says it was his idea, Calls out Critics
They were ready to discredit it before they even tried it, and if it didn't play exactly how they imagined it... then they passed it off," Hawk said. "I don't agree with people who say the board's not responsive," he add. "I think that they're just not giving it a fair shake. And I think a lot of them came into it with an attitude that it's going to suck.
I know that (RIDE) is super fun, and I think there's a misconception that I just stick my name on a game," he said. "I brought this idea to Activision, and I saw it through,
I've been playing it every step of the way and I am very proud of it.
I've been following Tony Hawk on twitter and he's been posting that he's been playing the game online. I think the bigger problem he should point out is that the game was marketed very poorly, and I believe that would hurt the game's sales more than what game critics had to say on the game. I'm puzzled as to why I've seen the board on display at Gamestops and Best Buys, but I have never seen the actual game on a kiosk. And since when do athletes get to pitch ideas for video games? I'm waiting for a Michael Phelps Bong Party game, or whatever was in the works that was going to have his name attached to it.
I know that RIDE is stuck in very poor places at stores where I live, which is any place the store can fit it behind the other large boxes of peripherals. It seems that without much marketing, it can't sell itself by just being in the store because there isn't much room for it to begin with.
As for the gameplay, I've only ever seen the Quicklook which doesn't make it seem very responsive based on Jeff's experience. Has anyone played this game and had an easier time with it?
Well he is wrong. Jeff even said it had potential back at E3, I hardly consider that dismissive. We all saw it, they were't hiding anything in that Quick Look, the game just doesn't look that great. Tony Hawk should have kept his mouth shut about this, let it die, then Activision should have taken a break with Tony Hawk games, maybe not as long as Jeff said, but still a couple years anyway. After people start to forget about it, come back with Tony Hawk Pro Skater 5, pretend the other shit didn't exist, return to what made the game good and work on that. Believe it or not every single game doesn't need to have motion controls or a peripheral, there is room for regular controller games too.
" Well he is wrong. Jeff even said it had potential back at E3, I hardly consider that dismissive. We all saw it, they were't hiding anything in that Quick Look, the game just doesn't look that great. Tony Hawk should have kept his mouth shut about this, let it die, then Activision should have taken a break with Tony Hawk games, maybe not as long as Jeff said, but still a couple years anyway. After people start to forget about it, come back with Tony Hawk Pro Skater 5, pretend the other shit didn't exist, return to what made the game good and work on that. Believe it or not every single game doesn't need to have motion controls or a peripheral, there is room for regular controller games too. "Well said. The only thing reviewers were pessimistic (if you want to even call it that) about before hand was the if there would be any other games that would support the peripheral or if it would be ye another one-game piece of plastic that would collect dust in the corner of the room once you were done with that game -- which it certainly is gearing up to be.
" Jeff Gerstmann tried it. Jeff Gerstmann gave it a bad review."Jeff is going to fire himself for not giving it a good score. There's going to be a huge controversy, and he's going to start a new site with Ryan, Brad and Vinny. It's going to be called "GameCop", and a large chunk of its community is going to consist of ex-GiantBomb members who have grown tired of GiantBomb's biased reviews, opting for Jeff & Co's honest writing.
It's funny too, as the reviews I have read on RIDE have either been glowing by the media that obviously decided to do the "play it for an hour at this review event and we'll let you post it up early" way and the rest being the negative ones that bought a retail copy to play it as much as possible.
Is this going to be another Lair, where Hawk is going to mail out instructions on how you're supposed to use the board?
I was hoping it would be good, too, but I'm not a professional revooer. I think a lot of it was just the lack of faith from Activisions obvious lack of faith in the game. I also heard that when Tony Hawk gets on it, he does really really good. So is that it, then? Do you have to actually know how to skateboard in order to play the bloody thing? Then why am I not just skateboarding?
I think this is a case of Tony being more hurt that something bearing his name is getting such overwhelmingly negative reactions. His namesake video game franchise has gone from the peak of sporting games to a laughing stock.
I think the review scores from the major sources are pretty well in agreement. This game is a shoddy piece of software with a reasonably sturdy hardware that may or may not actually work. The added fact that Activision wouldn't even send anyone a review copy speaks volumes. This experiment turned out to be an unmitigated disaster that Activision is trying to push out the door and completely forget. Sorry Tony.
There was probably a reason why Activision hid this game from the press Mr. Hawk.
I will give Tony credit in that he seems relatively active in actually promoting "his" games. And I don't think anyone thought the idea was that stupid. They were just wary of the execution and lack of attention Activision gave it.
I bet Activision set Tony Hawk up with the RIDE skateboard in front of a TV that was playing Skate, and someone in a back room somewhere was making what Hawk did on the skateboard happen in Skate. That would clearly explain everything.
Listening to the last Bombcast points out what they should first do. Put out Tony Hawk Classic. Remake the First 2 games with the mechanics of Tony Hawk 3, which is when the game reached its apex, and needed no more changes to the core gameplay. Then put those first 3 games out on the XBLA and PSN with HD graphics. Maybe the first two games dont need to be overhauled in gameplay to play like 3, but 3 was the best in the series but the first 2 have the real classic feel since they came out on the DC and PS1.
" if you have some skateboarding skills i bet the game is funner. But fuck. If you have some skateboarding skills, your out skateboarding. "I fucking love you. Haha.
Because this is exactly right.
Lots of decent games don't get their fair shake.. this isn't one. Every critic that tore into this game did so with accuracy and it was a lot more than an unresponsive piece of hardware that brought this half-assed game down.
@VWGTI said:
" Denial. "
Everything he says about the game is worthless. No offense to him personally, he's trying to sell his game, he's not gonna be all like, "hell yeah this game sucks! What the hell were the developers thinking?"
" @Metal_Gear_Sunny said:hmm, have we met before..." Jeff Gerstmann tried it. Jeff Gerstmann gave it a bad review."Jeff is going to fire himself for not giving it a good score. There's going to be a huge controversy, and he's going to start a new site with Ryan, Brad and Vinny. It's going to be called "GameCop", and a large chunk of its community is going to consist of ex-GiantBomb members who have grown tired of GiantBomb's biased reviews, opting for Jeff & Co's honest writing. "
Please Log In to post.
This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:
Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.Comment and Save
Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.
Log in to comment