Something went wrong. Try again later

Silellak

This user has not updated recently.

11 0 10 0
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

Silellak's forum posts

Avatar image for silellak
Silellak

11

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Hey! Just started playing on PC about a week ago and would love to hop into the clan. My name in game is Silellak.

Thank you!

Avatar image for silellak
Silellak

11

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@towolie said:

how can you complain about him removing exploits? this is way more fun if patrick needs to beat the level using the path intended to defeat it!

i'm neutral, i'd like to see patrick beat it but only after a long long time!

Agreed. I think Patrick would rather have it this way - he wants to beat Dan at his best, not find an accidental way through the level that Dan didn't intend.

Besides, people should really lighten up - it's for charity! This is the most entertaining thing I've seen in the gaming community in awhile, and the fact it's for a good cause is the icing on the cake. No reason to insert drama where none is needed.

Avatar image for silellak
Silellak

11

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I disliked the way anti-gg attacked those right of the bat. The anti "gamer" stuff was vitriolic and reminded me heavily of when I was young and games was a seen as a nerdy thing.

I disliked the way that in the first few days there was a complete blackout from the media. I know it was an act of misogny and a breach of privacy but the universal silence was the wrong thing to do. If the allegations were investigate and shown to be completely false by someone like Patrick this thing could have been over. Instead journalists said the information came from a act that was worse than the allegation hence it would be inappropriate to follow where it led.

Ethic's in journalism is a topic that upsets me a bit. I live in Australia where the Murdoch empire runs pretty much every major newspaper. I've seen what corruption can do in electing the buffoon we have now. And when it comes to video games, it's past isn't clean. Saying that, this is video games. Jeff said a while ago that if you don't trust him, then stop listening and I've taken that to heart. I mostly get my gaming information these days from podcasts and video. Sure a review says 9/10 on IGN but you listen to a podcast and there is various opinions and a discussion and from that I can gleam buying information or appreciation for the art form in a far better format I feel.

At this point I don't trust Polygon, because of how much Microsoft paid for the documentary and for the pro SimCity stance they took. I don't go on twitter blasting them and saying they are biased, I just stopped going there.

I don't know, I'm not pro-gg as I don't feel they have much to stand on but the response by the gaming media was equally disgusting. It's no wonder that when it went to twitter (A horrible platform for debate) it would turn into a shit slinging contest.

Honestly, I think a huge part of the problem is that GamerGate started at the wrong time, for the wrong reasons. The time for GamerGate was when Jeff got fired from GameStop for giving a game a bad review; not when two adults in the industry engaged in consensual sexual activity and an ex got very and decided to post about it.

It's hard to expect good things to come out of something with such a rotten core.

If you need any more proof that GamerGate’s philosophy is flawed at its core - those who claim to stand for it have been so focused on destruction of those they disagree with, rather than creating a place of their own that represents the ideals they supposedly stand for.