Revolver: I've been morbidly curious about this Guy Ritchie film for years, largely because it was torn to shreds upon release and (along with Swept Away) seemed like it would kill his career, but also because I've got several friends who really, really liked it at the time and I was excited to see if I would agree with them on it versus the critical consensus.
Well, I didn't. This film is pretty terrible. Superficially similar to the kinetic crime dramas that made Ritchie's name, it's shot through with heady musings on the nature of ego and numerology, drawing heavily on his interest in Kabbalah at the time, giving the film a pseudo-intellectual sheen that never really amounts to anything. The action is mostly pretty bad and some of the casting is bizarre (Ray Liotta plays a crime lord but his dialogue was clearly written for an English actor, so there's little turns of phrase that sound totally wrong coming from him), though the worst thing about it is the sense of ponderous seriousness applied to a story which is pretty straightforward. It really feels like Ritchie is straining to be taken seriously and demonstrating at every turn that he's not deep or talented enough to carry it off.
That all being said, it's probably the most fascinating film of his career. The film is a spectacular misfire on every level, but compared to pretty much everything else he's made, it's really ambitious and strange. Even if that ambition is wildly misguided and misplaced, it's hard not to be impressed at how big of a gamble he took with the film. Plus, it's got some solid performances from Jason Statham, Andre 3000 and Mark Strong which are almost worth it. Not quite, but almost. (2/5)
Log in to comment