Something went wrong. Try again later
    Follow

    NBA Jam

    Game » consists of 7 releases. Released Oct 05, 2010

    Return to the roots of arcade NBA basketball in the 2010 installment of NBA Jam. Developed by EA Canada for seventh-generation game consoles, this rebirth brings back the gameplay, aesthetics, and gratuitous secrets of the original 1993 arcade game.

    NBA Jam HD Hitting Stores In November, Will Cost 50 Bones

    • 165 results
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    Avatar image for kyle
    Kyle

    2383

    Forum Posts

    6307

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 12

    #101  Edited By Kyle
    @Quansto said:
    " @patrick said:
    " @Quansto said:
    " This game has DLC written all over it. "
    Except the part where it came out on the Wii and got fine reviews. Oops. "
    Actually, I wasn't talking about the quality of the game, but rather the "tacked-on" nature that EA gave it. No oops needed, just read it more carefully chief. :) I would totally pick this game up, $15 sounds about right. Shame about the Wii, hope you didnt get stuck with the $50 for something A LOT of people almost got for significantly less; dodged a bullet there lol.  "
    His response to your comment made perfect sense and was entirely appropriate. I think you're the one who needs to do the careful reading, chief.
    Avatar image for captain_clayman
    captain_clayman

    3349

    Forum Posts

    10

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #102  Edited By captain_clayman

    so lets get the wii version then? 
     
    i was like OOOOH  AWESOME and then i was like AW DAMN.

    Avatar image for kyle
    Kyle

    2383

    Forum Posts

    6307

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 12

    #103  Edited By Kyle

    I feel like the rest of the world just caught up to what I've been saying about this game the whole damn time. It's a shinier version of a mid-90s arcade game for $50. Yeah, no thanks.

    Avatar image for mrklorox
    MrKlorox

    11220

    Forum Posts

    1071

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #104  Edited By MrKlorox

    idiot fucks and pieces of shits. nobody's gonna buy your game now. imbeciles

    Avatar image for deadmoscow
    deadmoscow

    287

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 3

    #105  Edited By deadmoscow

    Christ, 50 bucks?  I was hoping for 40.  

    Avatar image for laxaloot
    Laxaloot

    122

    Forum Posts

    68

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    #106  Edited By Laxaloot

    Yeah... 50 bucks makes this a no go.

    Avatar image for sil3n7
    Sil3n7

    1512

    Forum Posts

    1540

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #107  Edited By Sil3n7

    If Activision pulled this shit they would be crucified.

    Avatar image for recroulette
    recroulette

    5460

    Forum Posts

    13841

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 15

    User Lists: 11

    #108  Edited By recroulette

    Remember when EA used to be the definition of evil?
     
    Pepperidge Farm remembers.

    Avatar image for hot_karl
    Hot_Karl

    3321

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #109  Edited By Hot_Karl
    @Sil3n7 said:
    " If Activision pulled this shit they would be crucified. "
    Who's pulling what "shit"? Selling a fully featured game for full price?  Doesn't matter if it's Activision, or EA, or LJN for all I care. Just because people think that they're entitled to pay what they want to pay for this game, doesn't mean that the companies should bow down to them and cater to their every whims. 
    Avatar image for sil3n7
    Sil3n7

    1512

    Forum Posts

    1540

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #110  Edited By Sil3n7
    @VinceNotVance said:
    " @Sil3n7 said:
    " If Activision pulled this shit they would be crucified. "
    Who's pulling what "shit"? Selling a fully featured game for full price?  Doesn't matter if it's Activision, or EA, or LJN for all I care. Just because people think that they're entitled to pay what they want to pay for this game, doesn't mean that the companies should bow down to them and cater to their every whims.  "
    Calling this game "fully featured" is a god damn hard sell there...
    Avatar image for max21
    Max21

    108

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #111  Edited By Max21
    @RecSpec said:
    " Remember when EA used to be the definition of evil?  Pepperidge Farm remembers. "
    lol nice
    Avatar image for deactivated-5fc3ed76e53eb
    deactivated-5fc3ed76e53eb

    65

    Forum Posts

    290

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    Personally, I'm willing to pay up to $25. Guess I'll be picking this up this time next year in the bargain bin.

    Avatar image for bonbolapti
    bonbolapti

    1752

    Forum Posts

    4208

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 11

    User Lists: 2

    #113  Edited By bonbolapti

    Seriously, You kids need to stop being a bunch of fucking babies. it's 50$ on all platforms and it'll be HD on 360 and PS3? grow a pair! suck it up!
     
    OH NO! I HAVE TO SPEND MONEY FOR A FULL FLEDGED GAME!
     
    to the articles credit though. the way Nicholson worded the title is fucking amateur, and is possibly the catalyst for all this bitching and whining   

    Avatar image for hot_karl
    Hot_Karl

    3321

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #114  Edited By Hot_Karl
    @Sil3n7: The way I see it, compared to the bare-bones game that was coming with NBA Elite, you're getting the Remix Tour mode as well (so boss battles & all those extra characters, Backboard smash & other mini-games), not to mention whatever else that is promised in the "free title update". Oh and online play which the Wii lacks. For the same price as the Wii version. 
      
    Again, you're acting as if you're entitled. It has all the features you want from an NBA Jam game. Honestly, what else could you want from the game that would make it worth your money? What's your reasoning as to why it's not worth $50? Is it because you deem it as an "arcade" game? And don't give me the argument that there are fully-featured XBLA games for $15, because on the other hand, there are games that have much less replay value that are selling for $60 easily. Why is NBA Jam getting crapped all over when it's selling for $50? Just because you'd rather pay $20 for the game doesn't mean that EA or anyone else thinks its worth $20.
    Avatar image for sil3n7
    Sil3n7

    1512

    Forum Posts

    1540

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #115  Edited By Sil3n7
    @VinceNotVance said:
    " @Sil3n7: The way I see it, compared to the bare-bones game that was coming with NBA Elite, you're getting the Remix Tour mode as well (so boss battles & all those extra characters, Backboard smash & other mini-games), not to mention whatever else that is promised in the "free title update". Oh and online play which the Wii lacks. For the same price as the Wii version. 
      
    Again, you're acting as if you're entitled. It has all the features you want from an NBA Jam game. Honestly, what else could you want from the game that would make it worth your money? What's your reasoning as to why it's not worth $50? Is it because you deem it as an "arcade" game? And don't give me the argument that there are fully-featured XBLA games for $15, because on the other hand, there are games that are much less replay value that are selling for $60 easily. Why is NBA Jam getting crapped all over when it's selling for $50? Just because you'd rather pay $20 for the game doesn't mean that EA or anyone else thinks its worth $20. "
    Well honestly, as you can see from a lot of responses from this thread, people don't want to spend 50 on this game. People have seen the quick look and that really did show most of the game so they are educated.
    Avatar image for hot_karl
    Hot_Karl

    3321

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #116  Edited By Hot_Karl
    @Sil3n7: That's fine that other people don't want to pay $50. If that's what they want,  they can probably get a copy new for less than $30 by March. I just think it's stupid that people are getting all uppity about this whole "value for the price" thing. It's like when Limbo came out & people bitched that it wasn't worth $15 because it was only 3 hours long and compared it to other XBLA games at the same (or lower) price. Don't compare it to anything else, you decide how much you are willing to spend on the game and go with that. NBA Jam isn't a gimped, half-assed game. EA believes it's worth $50. I feel that I'll most definitely get enjoyment out of the $50 I'll spend on that game.    
     
    Also, this thread is probably full of the same people who said they weren't going to buy Left 4 Dead 2 but did anyway. The same people who said that the Modern Warfare 2 maps for $15 were a rip off but bought them anyway. You all want to make a statement about a game's worth? Quit bitching about it and decide with your wallet by not supporting this game.
    Avatar image for mudman
    MudMan

    1423

    Forum Posts

    300

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 11

    #117  Edited By MudMan
    @Wrighteous86 said:
    " The things that annoy me most about modern gamers is the feeling of self-entitlement. "
    Avatar image for machofantastico
    MachoFantastico

    6762

    Forum Posts

    24

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 73

    User Lists: 4

    #118  Edited By MachoFantastico

    I was interested in NBA Jam HD after the quick look, but not even to pay full price.

    Avatar image for andorski
    Andorski

    5482

    Forum Posts

    2310

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #119  Edited By Andorski

    Where was this price bitching when the Wii version was announced?
     
    I'm really asking.  These comments have me dumbfounded.

    Avatar image for tebbit
    tebbit

    4659

    Forum Posts

    861

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 3

    User Lists: 6

    #120  Edited By tebbit
    @VinceNotVance: Although L4D2 turned out to be excellent value for money, whereas NBA Jam is yet to prove whether it is or is not worth $50 bux. 
     
    I can't comment on the MW2 map packs, because in New Zealand they were $30 (sure Activision, ignore the exchange rate why don't'cha) and... lets be realistic. That's a lot to pay for a few maps.
    Avatar image for grimace
    Grimace

    392

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 2

    #121  Edited By Grimace

    Grow up, cheapskates. 
     
    Yes, it was going to be free but only if you bought NBA Elite and it was going to be stripped of features. 

    NBA Jam is worth full price any day of the week. It was like this on the SNES, the Megadrive, the PSX, the 64 (Hangtime) and even the remake on PS2.

    Avatar image for sil3n7
    Sil3n7

    1512

    Forum Posts

    1540

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #122  Edited By Sil3n7
    @NoelVeiga said:
    " @Wrighteous86 said:
    " The things that annoy me most about modern gamers is the feeling of self-entitlement. "
    "
    Ya. It's really weird people want value out of the money they spend. 
    Avatar image for wrighteous86
    wrighteous86

    4036

    Forum Posts

    3673

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 5

    User Lists: 1

    #123  Edited By wrighteous86
    @Sil3n7:  People were fine when they had to pay $60 dollars for the game (along with Elite - which many admitted they didn't want) and it had much less in the way of features.  This exact same game came out on the Wii, minus HD graphics and an online mode for the same exact price and no one bitched.  You're getting more than Wii gamers for the same amount of money, and the game reviewed well on the Wii.  That means most reviewers thought it was worth it for gamers to pick it up.  Adding two major features and releasing it on another console for the same price a month later means reviewers probably think it's an even better deal than what the Wii users got.  People just got in the mindset that it would be released cheaper because it was originally a stripped-down pack in.  They've added more to it, to make it on par with the Wii version, so it only makes sense that it would have price parity with that version.  If they added those two features and made it $30 cheaper like some gamers say they wanted/expected/deserved, that would be an enormous "Fuck you" to every gamer that bought it on the Wii.
    Avatar image for badwhodo
    badwhodo

    262

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #124  Edited By badwhodo

    I'm late to this thread and haven't read every comment but, to me, as a non-Wii owner and NBA Jam fan; I was totally psyched to hear that it was free with Elite. 
     
    Flash forward to Elite being utter shit.  "NBA Jam is no longer free with purchase of our $60 Elite game; we shall, instead, charge $50 for said "free game" because our 
    $60 game is a piece of shit and we can't fix as-mentioned piece of shit that quickly but, we love your money."    
     
    I understand the stripped  features argument but would those 
    stripped features equal to $50 worth of XBLM purchases?

    Avatar image for wrighteous86
    wrighteous86

    4036

    Forum Posts

    3673

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 5

    User Lists: 1

    #125  Edited By wrighteous86
    @badwhodo said:

    " I'm late to this thread and haven't read every comment but, to me, as a non-Wii owner and NBA Jam fan; I was totally psyched to hear that it was free with Elite.  Flash forward to Elite being utter shit.  "NBA Jam is no longer free with purchase of our $60 Elite game; we shall, instead, charge $50 for said "free game" because our $60 game is a piece of shit and we can't fix as-mentioned piece of shit that quickly but, we love your money."     I understand the stripped  features argument but would those stripped features equal to $50 worth of XBLM purchases? "

     Every game mode and feature in the game besides 2-on-2 online matches?  Probably, yes.  Just like many Wii gamers and reviewers stated when it came out last week.
    Avatar image for badwhodo
    badwhodo

    262

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #126  Edited By badwhodo
    @Wrighteous86: i did read those reviews and i do see your point, but; i don't think those "extras" are worth $50 on top of what was supposed to be a free game.  To me, its the slight of hand a company pulled to shadow a bad product with a good one.  Its bad business.
    Avatar image for meatball
    MEATBALL

    4235

    Forum Posts

    790

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 10

    #127  Edited By MEATBALL

    Rargh! I don't want to spend $50 on this game, EA must be evil!
     
    Goddamn, guys. Grow up.

    Avatar image for redhatdrew
    RedHatDrew

    375

    Forum Posts

    842

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 7

    #128  Edited By RedHatDrew

    I really hate to say trite and cliche things, but in a case like this, it seems appropritate. 
     
    *ahem* 
     
    "lolumad, bro?" 
     
    There I said it.

    Avatar image for none
    None

    71

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #129  Edited By None

    I guess I'll go find my old NBA Jam cartridge then.

    Avatar image for metal_mills
    metal_mills

    3604

    Forum Posts

    4049

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 10

    User Lists: 3

    #130  Edited By metal_mills

    If this was $15 on XBLA I'd buy it in a second. Hell, I'd buy it at $20. But $50? Give me a break.

    Avatar image for penguindust
    penguindust

    13129

    Forum Posts

    22

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #131  Edited By penguindust

    Mmm, $40 is the sweet-spot on this game for me.  There just doesn't seem to be enough playtime value in it to warrant a $50 price tag.  On the other hand $40 puts it at the bargain price level in my mind, so I am willing to overlook a lot for that amount.   I'm going to hope that when the game drops next month, some online retailers have it on sale.  And, yes, $10 is a big enough price difference to keep me from buying a game.  It's the same amount (usually) that prevents me from wasting money on collector's editions, too.

    Avatar image for professoress
    ProfessorEss

    7962

    Forum Posts

    160

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 11

    #132  Edited By ProfessorEss

    It'll be interesting to see how this goes down.
     
    I think EA may be making a mistake here. Seems to me that they saw a lot of buzz surrounding NBA JAM, a lot of comments about how "I'm gonna buy Elite just to get JAM".
     
    The question now is, how many of these people would've actually gone through with this when it was time for the money to change hands, and how many were exaggerating what they really thought it was worth just to express that they like NBA JAM?

    Avatar image for bloodgraiv3
    Bloodgraiv3

    2730

    Forum Posts

    2380

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 9

    User Lists: 9

    #133  Edited By Bloodgraiv3

    Ugggh I don't want to spend that much on this game
    Avatar image for napalm
    napalm

    9227

    Forum Posts

    162

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #134  Edited By napalm

    I like NBA Jam. This doesn't really feel like a fifty dollar game to me, though. I guess I view it in the perspective that I'd turn on my Sega Genesis to play a game of NBA Jam T.E., and that was pretty much it for the week. I like the series. It's goofy fun. I'm just not into it hardcore, and I think it might be hard for me to reason with myself that I would get the most out of it with fifty dollars, y'know? I don't know. I'll need to sit on this for a week or two before I decide whether I'll get it right now.

    Avatar image for geralt
    Geralt

    492

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #135  Edited By Geralt

     Why are some of you guys seem upset that people are complaining about things being to expensive?
    That's what we do!

    Avatar image for captainlunchbox
    Captainlunchbox

    548

    Forum Posts

    955

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 7

    User Lists: 20

    #136  Edited By Captainlunchbox
    @VinceNotVance said:
    " @Sil3n7: That's fine that other people don't want to pay $50. If that's what they want,  they can probably get a copy new for less than $30 by March. I just think it's stupid that people are getting all uppity about this whole "value for the price" thing. It's like when Limbo came out & people bitched that it wasn't worth $15 because it was only 3 hours long and compared it to other XBLA games at the same (or lower) price. Don't compare it to anything else, you decide how much you are willing to spend on the game and go with that. NBA Jam isn't a gimped, half-assed game. EA believes it's worth $50. I feel that I'll most definitely get enjoyment out of the $50 I'll spend on that game.    
     
    Also, this thread is probably full of the same people who said they weren't going to buy Left 4 Dead 2 but did anyway. The same people who said that the Modern Warfare 2 maps for $15 were a rip off but bought them anyway. You all want to make a statement about a game's worth? Quit bitching about it and decide with your wallet by not supporting this game. "
    I agree with just about everything you said, but I feel the need to make this point: 
     
     EA doesn't believe it's worth 50 dollars- EA KNOWS there is a certain demographic with 2 very important aspects needed to sell this game: That demographic is people with 1.) Blind nostalgia, and 2.)  people who don't give a shit about where their money goes. 
     
    If you don't fall into either one of these categories, don't buy the game. Just ignore it. Sure the people I named above are basically to blame for all the yesteryear rehashes and cash-ins, but don't let it get you down. Just don't buy the stuff. 
     
    Also it's probably 50 dollars to try and recoup some of the losses incurred byt the delay of NBA Elite 11. I chuckled at that.
    Avatar image for garyoldman
    garyoldman

    33

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #137  Edited By garyoldman

    Yup. Its because Elite was pushed back

    Avatar image for onan
    onan

    1356

    Forum Posts

    8845

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 10

    #138  Edited By onan
    @Milkman said:

    " I don't understand why everyone is so up in arms about this.. The Wii version is $50 and no one had a problem with that. Plus, this version is in HD and has online. The "free" version that came with Elite was just going to have Exhibition mode. That's like an eighth of the game.  "

     
      1. No one had a problem with the Wii version coming out at $50 because no one buys Wii games. Wii owners are used to being asked to pay full price for gimped versions of popular titles, so being asked to pay full retail for what would otherwise be an XBLA or PSN title seems par for the course.


    2. The "free" version is all anyone cared about. No one could give a rat's ass about them including a myriad of single player modes, because honestly, it's SINGLE PLAYER. No one goes to a big head 2-on-2 basketball game for the campaign mode. In fact, they would have probably gladly paid 15 for the Vs mode only as a downloadable title.
     
     
    This is going to sell terribly, however I'm pretty sure once they pop it onto the Games On Demand service for 20 bones, it'll outperform retail. Shame we'll all have to wait that long.
     
     

     
    Avatar image for sil3n7
    Sil3n7

    1512

    Forum Posts

    1540

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #139  Edited By Sil3n7
    @Wrighteous86 said:
    " @Sil3n7:  People were fine when they had to pay $60 dollars for the game (along with Elite - which many admitted they didn't want) and it had much less in the way of features.  This exact same game came out on the Wii, minus HD graphics and an online mode for the same exact price and no one bitched.  You're getting more than Wii gamers for the same amount of money, and the game reviewed well on the Wii.  That means most reviewers thought it was worth it for gamers to pick it up.  Adding two major features and releasing it on another console for the same price a month later means reviewers probably think it's an even better deal than what the Wii users got.  People just got in the mindset that it would be released cheaper because it was originally a stripped-down pack in.  They've added more to it, to make it on par with the Wii version, so it only makes sense that it would have price parity with that version.  If they added those two features and made it $30 cheaper like some gamers say they wanted/expected/deserved, that would be an enormous "Fuck you" to every gamer that bought it on the Wii. "
    No it wouldn't
     
    1. It was going to be free with elite 
    2. Games on 360 and PS3 command higher standards and lower prices to be worth a damn. Their catalog is leaps and bounds greater than the Wii's. You only need to compete with whats on the platform. So the fact you say "oh the wii version was 50" doesnt mean anything because what does it have to compete with??
     
    Answer: Nothing.
    Avatar image for mjhealy
    MjHealy

    2009

    Forum Posts

    17432

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 10

    User Lists: 15

    #140  Edited By MjHealy

    But it's the same as the Wii version. Why is there so much bitching? I know that this is the internet but this is a nicer looker Wii version plus online for the same price.

    Avatar image for peppermario
    peppermario

    5

    Forum Posts

    3

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #141  Edited By peppermario

    Funny how there wasn't this much bitching when the Wii version was announced for 50 dollars. 
     
    Then if the game didn't sell because it was too expensive people would be like "See, Wii games don't sell." 
     
    But now that it's coming out for the other consoles with more features and hd graphics all for the same price people are like, "HELL NO!!"

    Avatar image for slowbird
    slowbird

    1911

    Forum Posts

    2650

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 18

    #142  Edited By slowbird
    @MjHealy said:
    " But it's the same as the Wii version. Why is there so much bitching? I know that this is the internet but this is a nicer looker Wii version plus online for the same price. "
    people are greedy.  they want it all, they want it now, and they want it for free.
    Avatar image for shadowking7
    ShadowKing7

    748

    Forum Posts

    27

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #143  Edited By ShadowKing7
    @Sil3n7 said:
    " @Wrighteous86 said:
    " @Sil3n7:  People were fine when they had to pay $60 dollars for the game (along with Elite - which many admitted they didn't want) and it had much less in the way of features.  This exact same game came out on the Wii, minus HD graphics and an online mode for the same exact price and no one bitched.  You're getting more than Wii gamers for the same amount of money, and the game reviewed well on the Wii.  That means most reviewers thought it was worth it for gamers to pick it up.  Adding two major features and releasing it on another console for the same price a month later means reviewers probably think it's an even better deal than what the Wii users got.  People just got in the mindset that it would be released cheaper because it was originally a stripped-down pack in.  They've added more to it, to make it on par with the Wii version, so it only makes sense that it would have price parity with that version.  If they added those two features and made it $30 cheaper like some gamers say they wanted/expected/deserved, that would be an enormous "Fuck you" to every gamer that bought it on the Wii. "
    No it wouldn't 1. It was going to be free with elite  2. Games on 360 and PS3 command higher standards and lower prices to be worth a damn. Their catalog is leaps and bounds greater than the Wii's. You only need to compete with whats on the platform. So the fact you say "oh the wii version was 50" doesnt mean anything because what does it have to compete with??  Answer: Nothing. "

    1.  It was going to have features removed, and a fuckload more people than not didn't want to buy Elite to get a gimped version. 
    2.  So that's why PS3 and 360 games cost $60 new and Wii games cost $50 new? :P 
     
    The PS3/360 version now not only gets the Wii content that would have been kept out of the bundle with Elite, but it also has the online play and it's the same price as the Wii version.  That should have made anyone who wanted it that was against getting it on the Wii or didn't have a Wii happy (key word being SHOULD).
     
    To those complaining about this price, I'm just gonna say this:  if any of you complained before about having to buy Elite for $60 to get a gimped Jam and are bitching now about how a standalone Jam that has all the features plus online costs the same as the version without online, please just shut the fuck up.
    Avatar image for deactivated-61f341f558336
    deactivated-61f341f558336

    222

    Forum Posts

    33

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    I would have rather got this as a downloadable title. It's like paying $50.00 for a super deep HD X-Men arcade game in retail. 
     
    This is just a glorified arcade game and I don't think I can personally pay retail prices for that.
    And why do the consumers have to suffer for EA's incompetency from NBA Elite 11?
    Now, we the consumers have to make up for their loss of sales like it's our fault. 

    *sheep noise*

    Avatar image for killer_meatballs
    killer_meatballs

    532

    Forum Posts

    11

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 6

    I was looking forward to this; I loved the original.   But $50?  I'll pass.

    Avatar image for kuribosshoe
    KuribosShoe

    694

    Forum Posts

    5498

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 4

    #146  Edited By KuribosShoe

    So people bitched that they put NBA Jam with Elite, and now they're bitching that it's a stand alone product.  That costs the same amount as the wii version.  Except it has online play so it's a better deal. 
     
    That is what's happening.

    Avatar image for cubical
    Cubical

    667

    Forum Posts

    2283

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #147  Edited By Cubical

    Fuck nba elite and NBA 2k11  Nba jam is way better than both of those anyway.

    Avatar image for ashtds
    AshTDS

    10

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #148  Edited By AshTDS

    If you want a good arcade basketball game for $15, pick up NBA Street Homecourt.  It is probably better than Jam anyway.
    Avatar image for eviljester1214
    EvilJester1214

    15

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #149  Edited By EvilJester1214

    it's cool
    but it's not 50 dollar cool

    Avatar image for omarstyles9
    OmarStyles9

    33

    Forum Posts

    3

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #150  Edited By OmarStyles9

    EA need to make an arcade spin off of Fifa for current consoles, and no I don't count Fifa Street 3 as that was just tragic.

    This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

    Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

    Comment and Save

    Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.