The first batch of CoD: Modern Warfare Wii images have been unveiled: 
 

• Features kept intact from the original - every multiplayer map, mode, AI in single player and campaigns.
• Fully configurable controls - smoother, more fluid movement - up to 6 presets.
• DLC and Wiispeak/Motionplus not supported.
• Graphical improvements, 30fps. Similar team to those behind World at War - 25/30 people.
• Online improvements over past CoD Wii - up to 10 players, possibility to invite connected friends.
• Sound effects/soundtrack ported over.

Should have ported it to PS2, it would have better graphics.

Will do. I hope no one expected anything significantly above W@W. The multiplayer content is where this port has to prove itself.

Oh dear.

Day 1..... 10 years ago.... You know I'm right. Right?

As usual, they make a game for PSP, and never bother to upgrade the graphics for the Wii port.

I think it looks alright, to be honest. I'm more interested in seeing how they fare with the multiplayer component, because that's what could sell me.

" @Willy105: Modern Warfare never was on the PSP... unless you're trying to be funny, and in that case it wasn't. "

I would like to thank Activision for putting no effort into trying to make the game look pretty with nice shaders.

Some of those images look like there taken for COD:4 single player  
 
3rd is from the mission Shock & Awe 
4th is from Blackout  
 
look familiar ?

" Will do. I hope no one expected anything significantly above W@W. The multiplayer content is where this port has to prove itself. "

It could be worse.

Oh, dear....

" @Meowayne said:

" Will do. I hope no one expected anything significantly above W@W. The multiplayer content is where this port has to prove itself. "

No, but this looks worse than WaW. And COD2. And many other last gen games. It's not acceptable, imo. The only upside is that it's "pre-beta" at the moment (then again there's not too much time left) so perhaps it will improve. Especially when compared to this...
 
Here's a shot Linky didn't include... Definitely even worse than WaW, as if they begun development when they announced it.

Don't be fooled, the enemy to the bottom right is apparently photoshopped in. The size is wrong, has a blur, and he's much higher quality... Sad. "

The textures are much sharper and more detailed, not to mention the superior dynamic lighting and shadows, self shadowing on top of that, and a ton of post-processing effects like motion blur and distortions and the fact it runs @ 60 fps. So, don't even imply they look comparable aside from art style, please. It may be cartoony, but it's still very detailed and not a blurry mess. The art style is far from their only difference.
 
Edit: again, even COD2 on the cube looks sharper than this. Thanks for ignoring this post and repeating ignorant comments.

" @Al3xand3r said:

" @Meowayne said:

" Will do. I hope no one expected anything significantly above W@W. The multiplayer content is where this port has to prove itself. "

No, but this looks worse than WaW. And COD2. And many other last gen games. It's not acceptable, imo. The only upside is that it's "pre-beta" at the moment (then again there's not too much time left) so perhaps it will improve. Especially when compared to this...
 
Here's a shot Linky didn't include... Definitely even worse than WaW, as if they begun development when they announced it.

Don't be fooled, the enemy to the bottom right is apparently photoshopped in. The size is wrong, has a blur, and he's much higher quality... Sad. "

Do you want them to make COD for the Wii cartoony then? Those pictures of RS2 do look a lot more clean, but really its graphically not much more impressive. the textures are not any greater, however the stylized look give it a much smoother feeling then the realistic look of MW2. "

" It could be worse. "

Those screenshots are hurting my eyes

I wasn't saying that it can't, I have a Wii and love it. I also do think they could make MW2 look a lot better on it, I was just pointing out that the only reason RS2 looks so much better is because the way they stylized the game.

I've already pre-ordered MW2 so I don't really think this game has a place in my video game collection.

@Zero, exactly, which is why the difference in quality with the dead enemy soldier is so striking. Look at it.

lol

Maybe the dead soldier in the COD pic isn't a photoshop, maybe its just a child with a mustache napping.

A company preying upon the uneducated Wii masses. Nothing new. This will sell millions once it's paired up with MW2s advertisements.

Ubi's Jason Vandenberghe said that he doesn't consider Red Steel 2 to be a technically impressive game. And I agree with him. The style is right on, but I doubt it has a higher polycount or higher amount of effects and lighting going on than World at War on the Wii. W@W Wii is a very smooth, pretty Wii game. Doesn't look like much in Screenshots, though. This will be the same.
 
And what's  up with you, anyways. A Wii graphics thread? Seriously? It's Modern Warfare with a lower polycount and without the shiny shaders. Big deal. To make up for it you'll be able to use a virtual flamethrower by pointing at people. Everyone's happy. 
 
 

I lol'd, seriously, this looks terrible hahaha

So hey. If all you guys want is pretty graphics, how do you find time to post here inbetween playing Myst and watching animated gifs of the transformers movies?

" So hey. If all you guys want is pretty graphics, how do you find time to post here inbetween playing Myst and watching animated gifs of the transformers movies? "

" Ubi's Jason Vandenberghe said that he doesn't consider Red Steel 2 to be a technically impressive game. And I agree with him. The style is right on, but I doubt it has a higher polycount or higher amount of effects and lighting going on than World at War on the Wii. W@W Wii is a very smooth, pretty Wii game. Doesn't look like much in Screenshots, though. This will be the same.
 
And what's  up with you, anyways. A Wii graphics thread?

" The textures are much sharper and more detailed, not to mention the superior dynamic lighting and shadows, self shadowing on top of that, and a ton of post-processing effects like motion blur and distortions and the fact it runs @ 60 fps. So, don't even imply they look comparable aside from art style, please. It may be cartoony, but it's still very detailed and not a blurry mess. The art style is far from their only difference."

What a surprise -- it looks like ass.

 
Details have emerged:
 

• Features kept intact from the original - every multiplayer map, mode, AI in single player and campaigns.
• Fully configurable controls - smoother, more fluid movement - up to 6 presets.
• DLC and Wiispeak/Motionplus not supported.
• Graphical improvements, 30fps. Similar team to those behind World at War - 25/30 people.
• Online improvements over past CoD Wii - up to 10 players, possibility to invite connected friends.
• Sound effects/soundtrack ported over.

I don't think the actual product is gonna be that horrible looking. I mean, look at these pictures from World at War.
 
 http://wii.ign.com/dor/objects/14222041/call-of-duty-world-at-war/images/call-of-duty-world-at-war-20081002040155654.html
 
Now I think the game looked alright, but these screenshots are horrible. If World at War looked good, I bet it will be the same on Wii.

"  
Details have emerged:
 

• Features kept intact from the original - every multiplayer map, mode, AI in single player and campaigns.
• Fully configurable controls - smoother, more fluid movement - up to 6 presets.
• DLC and Wiispeak/Motionplus not supported.
• Graphical improvements, 30fps. Similar team to those behind World at War - 25/30 people.
• Online improvements over past CoD Wii - up to 10 players, possibility to invite connected friends.
• Sound effects/soundtrack ported over.

"

Looks like dooky. 

Seriously, what did we expect? This port probably cost like a dollar to make.