Rate Giant Bomb out of 5. I give it a 4/5
Rate Giant Bomb
This topic is locked from further discussion.
3/5
Much better than before but it's abit of a mess and hard to navigate, they need a easier menu say Gametrailers or Gamespot have. They need to get rid of all the crap on the main page you can go to in the menus and put big news theres and stuff you want to see that catches your eye on a homepage.
I rate Giant Bomb aardvark/۩
The site is a little slow right now, but I'm liking the new features. As long as we're free to add the sort of sections in the wiki system as we want (within reason), and things are kept up to date in a timely manner, I think the site will be really cool.
Four out of five. The crew at Giant Bomb are far more personal than any other gaming site, and features like Quick Look, TANG, and the Bombcast are way ahead of GameSpot and IGN. The interviews, and videos in general, are solid. The site is clean and intuitive. However, it isn't my one-stop shop for all things gaming. The influx of news is vastly inferior to Joystiq and Kotaku, the editorial staff - while excellent - aren't the literary masters at GameTrailers, video reviews are too rare, user-uploaded videos are non-existent, and the forum is relatively small.
Most importantly, though: Where the hell is Alex Navarro?
4.75/5
That .25 is because of the massive amount of bugs in the site. But that's gonna happen when you have a BADASS site design.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment