I'm guessing 3.
 
It's a good game I think it tries to hard to be/beat MW2, and thus losing its own self.

I'm putting it at four. I don't think it tries to be MW2 at all, though it definitely has to try to beat it. 

I say 5 since he gave the first one a 5 and everyone says this game is even better than the last.

its bad company 
 
it has explosions, and lots of them
 
jeff loves explosions

" I'm guessing 3.  It's a good game I think it tries to hard to be/beat MW2, and thus losing its own self. "

4 because I like to live dangerously 

" I'm guessing 3.  It's a good game I think it tries to hard to be/beat MW2, and thus losing its own self. "

I think it'll get 5. Looks like a great game. I'm not gonna get it cuz i have cod. That's all I really need.

He gave the first one a five, and this one is better. So....at least a four. I say five.

ONE! Cause its Jeff.... :P 
I would given it a five! At least from what I've tried in the beta

Hm hm, well it's not really doing anything new or revolutionary over the first Bad Company.  So even if it's super fun, it'll probably get 4.

I don't even care, I'll be buying the game regardless. But if the full game is anything like it's predecessor, then I'd say a 5 star rating is called for.   
 
Also, who cares? I'm more interested in what he has to say about it then the rating.

i just hope this game is as shitty as mw, or as pub friendly

I say 5 stars. BF:BC 2 ponders to Jeff's sensibilities. Nobody blows shit up like DICE.

" I'm guessing 3.  It's a good game I think it tries to hard to be/beat MW2, and thus losing its own self. "

i said 4 stars.
 
no monstertruck means -1 star so ^_^

" @natetodamax: Are you rotating through a set of avatars now? You used that one before. Anyways, since Jeff gave the first game 5 stars he will most likely give this game 5 stars. "

Probably 4. 

4, Jeff always talks about how he doesn't like playing MMORPG's with people, he doesn't seem like he is into a team style multiplayer.

4 or 5 for sure. Seems to build on what the first started and become bigger and better. Also one big thing for me from the 3 minutes I played they fleshed out the controls a lot which I think will make it all the more enjoyable, as much as I loved the first I thought the clunkiness of the controls held it back a bit.

8.8

" 4, Jeff always talks about how he doesn't like playing MMORPG's with people, he doesn't seem like he is into a team style multiplayer. "

5 stars of course.

4 stars realistically, but it seems like from fan's impressions its a 5 stars game.
 
Just too much hype right now. Do you realise how much trailers and advertisements there are for this game?

" its bad company  it has explosions, and lots of them jeff loves explosions "

" its bad company  it has explosions, and lots of them jeff loves explosions "

" @CL60: Jeff doesn't like playing team focused game with other players (at least from what I have gathered from his feelings for MMORPG's), thus making the multiplayer not his style. "

" @XII_Sniper: I must be explaining this wrong.  1. Jeff stated he doesn't like using a text based chat to communicate with people in an MMORPG. Establishing he doesn't like working with random people in a game. 2. Bad Company 2 is a very team focused game. If Jeff doesn't like talking to people through text, why would he like talking to random people through a headset? 3. This would make the multiplayer lose its biggest feature.   I could be totally wrong and he could love talking to random people on BC2 or he could have found a group of dudes to roll with. "

4 guaranteed. He liked the first ones single player for its sandbox style, this game is much more linear. Multiplayer is brilliant, single player is solid but it stumbles. I am tired of the modern warfare 2 shit, battlefield pioneered most of things it's being accused of ripping off. People who don't understand that, need a history lesson.

Bad Company got a five, and Modern Warfare 2 got a five. 
 
Clearly, Jeff likes games that are similar to Bad Company 2. 
 
He'll probably give it a five.

Battlefield IS Battlefield. Anyone saying it is trying to be or copy MW2 really doesn't know what the hell they are talking about. Seeing how I had some problems with Bad Company 1, and he gave it a 5/5, just from the MP demo/beta I absolutely love 2, so I'm expecting a 4 or a 5. If it isn't what I'm expecting? Well, he isn't me, so I'm not going to whine like some other people seem to want to do when a reviewer doesn't fully agree with them. They are entitled to their own opinion, and that's how it is.
 
Also, comparing this to an mmo makes no sense..I don't understand why you seem to think they are in any way similar.

im gonna go with 4.

If there were boobs, I'm pretty sure it would be Jeff's GOTY. 
 
However, there's also Just Cause 2.

4/5 cos Jeff loves him some MW2 and this ain't MW2.

4 because it doesn't seem like this one will be as funny.  He dug the single player and they're focusing more of multi this time, we'll see.

" 8.8 "

1 BECUZ COD5 IS SU MUH BETTAH L0OLJIHJLSKDJKLFNDSKJBNS,ND,M 
 
4-5.

Probably 4 stars. Jeff isn't the biggest fan of multiplayer FPS's.

" its bad company  it has explosions, and lots of them jeff loves boobs "