New rating system for GB

US Gamer shared this picture from their Facebook account and hour ago. It is clear where this needs to be revived.

please no spam.

So which one of those faces better describes the two Garfield games Jeff played?

@johnymyko: All of them, in equal measure.

I remember GamePro ran a big feature on Garfield: Caught in the Act for Genesis when it first came out. They hyped the hell out of the game, and talked about how Jim Davis's personal involvement set it apart from other licensed games. I don't recall what they ultimately scored the game in their review, but the big preview spread felt like it was written by SEGA marketing. I read the feature as a 10 year-old who enjoyed Garfield quite a bit, and I was hyped as hell. I wanted the game from my parents for Christmas, but then I played the game at a kiosk at Incredible Universe and was shocked at how bad it was compared to how good the review made it sound. The game was surprisingly difficult for a platformer based on a child-friendly property, most likely to make up for its lack of content.

For a rating of 1.0 is he spitting some sort of barb? Is he eating a gross lollipop? Angry that his temperature is being taken?

Clearly don't go to GamePro for your non biased Garfield game reviews, those guys were bought by Jim Davis.

So every game in Garfield's life is a 2. Pretty sure that's his default expression

@quid_pro_bono: It's his spiky cat penis that is somehow coming out of his mouth.

1.0 Jeff licking Switch cartridge.

2.0 Jeff face from the fidget spinner.

3.0 Jeff making it “bigger”

4.0 Jeff trying to look happy on a derailed podcast.

5.0 Jeff visiting an all girls Japanese virtual reality school

I came in here to make a comment but I think we can just shut this thread down now. There's nothing else to be said.

5.0 ... Garfield put mushrooms in his lasagna.

How's this any different from the current system? I just.. I don't see it.